Virtual Conference – Disability and Rights: The Possibilities and Limits of Rights Discourse under Neoliberalism
Friday 13 – Saturday 14 June 2025, online (UK)
This is a two half-day conference organised by Disability Law and Social Justice Stream of the Socio-Legal Studies Association and Marxism and Disability Network scholars, and kindly funded by the Socio-Legal Studies Association and University of Leicester.
The conference will take place online (using the Zoom platform) on:
● Friday, 13th June 2025, 12:30-17:30 BST (UK Time).
● Saturday, 14th June 2025, 09:30-14:30 (UK Time).
Plenary sessions
Speakers:
● Ravi Malhotra, Professor of Law, University of Ottawa.
● Peter Bartlett, Professor of Mental Health Law, University of Nottingham.
Discussant:
● Anna Lawson, Professor of Law, University of Leeds.
While fundamental rights were enumerated in the 1948 Universal Declaration on Human Rights (UDHR), rights instruments have proliferated since the International Covenants on Civil and Political Rights and on Economic (ICCPR), Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) entered into force in 1976. Disability-specific rights and their legal representation have been notably late to the conversation, with the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities appearing only in 2006. This and other legislative initiatives and social movements have seen some notable wins for disabled communities, with improvements to access and inclusion in both the built and social environments.
Despite a panoply of rights existing at national, regional, international and transnational levels, intractable disadvantage remains. In terms of fundamental rights, the right to life is consistently jeopardised through the lack of equal access to healthcare, In terms of civil and political rights, disabled people still remain largely excluded from political processes and continue to face barriers to freedom from inhuman and degrading treatment, liberty, access to justice, and many more. In terms of economic and social (in)equality, the disadvantage experienced by disabled people in relation to employment, educational attainment, income and community inclusion are well documented and remain intractable. Given the painfully slow rate of progress, what role can and should rights play in realising full equality for those with impairments? What alternative strategies and discourses might realise equality and emancipation?
Marx was not optimistic about the potential of legal rights to resolve the tensions generated under capitalism; noting the high costs, length of time, and exclusionary systems that dissuade engagement with the legal system and individual rights narratives of oppressed peoples. His conception of ‘bourgeois rights’ presents rights as individualistic, based on private interest and separated from community. Rights, Marx (and later thinkers like Pashukanis) argued, offer formal but not substantive equality and permit the justification of vast economic inequalities. In short, rights are necessary to defend capitalist social ordering. As Russell’s work has demonstrated, rights cannot, and were never intended to, realise full substantive equality for disabled people.
Recent scholarship has begun to explore how rights discourses establish or legitimate neoliberalism by structuring and defending private freedoms and pro-market policies, justifying non-interference by the state; but these insights remain underexplored in disability scholarship and activism. We propose a two-day symposium to question how far disability scholars and activists should pursue rights strategies; what rights-based narratives offer disabled people; and their possible shortcomings or pitfalls.
Find more information here and book your free place here.